Comments on: We don’t need i-names in OpenID 2.0 specs, please keep OpenID lightweight http://brucewang.net/2007/02/13/37 Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:19:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: anothr user http://brucewang.net/2007/02/13/37#comment-270 anothr user Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:07:26 +0000 http://brucewang.net/2007/02/13/37#comment-270 <strong>Anothr feed track -Bruce Wang - Simple, Love, Courage...</strong> One new subscriber from Anothr Alerts:lifeng181... Anothr feed track -Bruce Wang - Simple, Love, Courage…

One new subscriber from Anothr Alerts:lifeng181…

]]> By: 天真 http://brucewang.net/2007/02/13/37#comment-185 天真 Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:51:17 +0000 http://brucewang.net/2007/02/13/37#comment-185 openId是否需要兼容iname这样一个不流行并且实际意义又不太大而且还是收费的身份体系，邮件组好想讨论过很多次的。 openId是否需要兼容iname这样一个不流行并且实际意义又不太大而且还是收费的身份体系，邮件组好想讨论过很多次的。

]]> By: 天真 http://brucewang.net/2007/02/13/37#comment-184 天真 Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:46:35 +0000 http://brucewang.net/2007/02/13/37#comment-184 你的这篇文章出现在planet OpenID里面了。：） 但是如果需要通过像idproxy这样的第三方工具来支援其他身份验证服务，那openid的安全性和可靠性就更加不能保障了。 你的这篇文章出现在planet OpenID里面了。：）

但是如果需要通过像idproxy这样的第三方工具来支援其他身份验证服务，那openid的安全性和可靠性就更加不能保障了。

]]> By: The Undevelopment Blog » We NEED i-names in OpenID 2.0. Please Keep OpenID Lightweight! http://brucewang.net/2007/02/13/37#comment-182 The Undevelopment Blog » We NEED i-names in OpenID 2.0. Please Keep OpenID Lightweight! Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:39:35 +0000 http://brucewang.net/2007/02/13/37#comment-182 [...] Bruce Wang posted this on his blog: Please don’t make simple things complicated, i-names could be easily support [...] [...] Bruce Wang posted this on his blog: Please don’t make simple things complicated, i-names could be easily support [...]

]]>